Urdu Pro
Pakistan News, Tech, Sports & Showbiz
ADVERTISEMENT

Pakistan “Deeply Hostile” to Journalism: Freedom Network’s Impunity Report 2026 Documents 97 Violations

“From violence to lawfare”: what the numbers show

Pakistan remained deeply hostile to journalism and its practitioners in 2025-26, despite a drop in the number of documented violations against the media. That is the headline finding of the Freedom Network Impunity Report 2026, released by the Islamabad-based media watchdog on 29 October 2026, just ahead of the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists observed on 2 November.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report, titled “From Violence to Lawfare: Process as Punishment for Journalists” and authored by journalist Adnan Rehmat and Freedom Network Executive Director Iqbal Khattak with technical assistance from International Media Support (IMS), documents 97 violations against media and media practitioners between October 2025 and August 2026. That is down from 142 violations in the preceding cycle — but the report is blunt about what the decline means: about 10 cases a month, with their nationwide spread and severity, showed that fewer violations did not mean greater safety.

The cases documented over those eleven months included one work-related killing, three attempted assassinations, 18 threats of murder or harm, 11 assaults, 13 legal actions and 32 threats of legal action. Punjab recorded 49 cases — just over half the national total — followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Islamabad and Balochistan. The report’s central argument is captured in a single line: impunity in Pakistan, it finds, “has evolved from a failure to punish violence into a broader system of coercion.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Digital and independent journalists in the crosshairs

A female Pakistani TV journalist holds a microphone to a U.S. Navy officer while a cameraman films, on the flight deck of the USS Peleliu, 12 August 2010 (archive photo).
Archive photo: a Pakistani TV journalist at work. (U.S. Navy, public domain)

One of the clearest patterns in the Freedom Network Impunity Report 2026 is who gets targeted. Digital and independent journalists were hit most often — the reporters and commentators working outside the protective umbrella of large media houses, many of them publishing on social media and digital platforms.

Equally striking is who the victims blame. In nearly two-thirds of the documented cases, victims or their families identified government authorities and officials as the alleged instigators. That figure reframes the story of press freedom in Pakistan: the threat is not only the gunman or the mob, but the machinery of the state itself, deployed against reporters whose work touches public expenditure, corruption or official conduct.

The report also notes a grim historical backdrop. More than 170 journalists have been documented as killed in the line of duty in Pakistan since January 2000 — and the killers of only three of them have ever been punished. Against that record, the report argues, the newer forms of pressure are not a replacement for violence so much as an addition to it.

PECA: when the process becomes the punishment

The sharpest section of the report deals with the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) and its use by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA). The watchdog describes the use of PECA against journalists to punish dissent as “central to this legal siege” of online journalism in the country.

Freedom Network’s analysis of representative PECA-related cases against journalists finds a recurring pattern: it starts with a complaint, notice or inquiry, then moves to appearance, FIR, arrest and bail — and ends, at best, in relief, an apology or an unresolved prosecution. Allegations involving defamation, false information, harassment or reputational harm, the report says, “are repeatedly channelled through cybercrime procedures” — including where the reporting in question concerned public spending, corruption or the conduct of officials.

The report’s most quoted passage may be its description of how the legal process itself becomes the penalty. Even without a confirmed FIR or a conviction, summons, device scrutiny, travel, legal costs, detention, repeated hearings and reputational harm “make the process itself punitive,” it says — adding that “relief is commonly limited to merely bail or procedural protection rather than final vindication.” Notably, the report also includes a practical guideline for journalists and other media practitioners on how to deal with PECA-related cases if targeted, aimed at minimising the harmful effects of what it calls lawfare.

Two commissions, little protection — what the report demands

An armed policeman stands among a crowd outside the Karachi Press Club on 5 November 2007 (archive photo).
Archive photo: outside the Karachi Press Club, 5 November 2007. (Credit: ange, CC BY-SA 2.0)

Pakistan has two laws on the statute books aimed at combating impunity for crimes against journalists, and two safety commissions established under them — one federal, one in Sindh. The report’s verdict on both is unsparing: institutional safeguards for media practitioners remain inadequate. “The federal journalist protection mechanism is effectively dysfunctional,” it says, “while the Sindh Commission, although more visible, has limited reach and demonstrated protection impact outside Karachi.”

Freedom Network Executive Director Iqbal Khattak put it directly at the launch: “Despite the presence on the statute books of two laws to combat impunity for crimes against journalists, such a finding should be a matter of concern for those at the helm of affairs of the two safety commissions established under these laws.”

The report closes with a concrete reform agenda. It calls for operational and properly resourced safety bodies; clearer protections for journalism and public-interest expression inside PECA; strict safeguards governing notices, arrests and device seizures; independent tracking of attacks and prosecutions; rapid legal aid, psychosocial and digital-security support for targeted journalists; stronger employer responsibility; and enforceable accountability — for both the perpetrators of violence and the officials who misuse legal process. Whether the state acts on any of it, the report suggests, will be measured not in press releases but in the next count: fewer cases, and this time, genuinely greater safety.

Sources: Freedom Network press release (29 October 2026); IANS reporting on the Impunity Report 2026 (30 October 2026).

Freedom Network Impunity Report 2026
Written by UrduPro Editorial Team
Articles on UrduPro are researched and reviewed by our editorial team before publication. See our Editorial Policy and Contact pages for how we work and how to send corrections.
UrduPro Editorial Team
UrduPro Correspondent

Articles on UrduPro are researched and reviewed by our editorial team before publication. See our Editorial Policy and Contact pages for how we work and how to send corrections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

URDU PRO